The area and exercise of worksite wellness today essentially involves three terms – health, wellness and wellbeing. Other terms also seen used include: thriving, flourishing, health promotion, optimal living and excellence of existence. However the big three are health, wellness and wellbeing.
As these terms are utilized interchangeably or as synonyms, I’ve wondered precisely how different or even the same are these terms? After I presented out this i believe, I figured it might be not so difficult to simply look-up their definitions and that i might have my answer.
But, boy was I wrong. Definitions only got me to date and never far at this. When I was reviewing definitions, it happened in my experience that worksite wellness programs today aren’t even always about health, but much more about worker health status. Both of these terms differ. Just how will they differ? In line with the definitions and studying I’ve done health status is really a condition in a fixed time, instead of the more global, encompassing idea of health.
What’s Health Status?
The Stedman’s seventh Edition Medical Dictionary for that Health Professions and Nursing (2012) definition is: “The amount of health of a person, group or population as assessed with that individual or by objective measures.”
The Oxford Highlighted Companion to Medicine (2001) defines the condition of health as the “degree that mental and physical functioning have been in equilibrium using the physical, biological and social atmosphere.”
In the 1997 article entitled Health Status Assessment, Stephen Wright uses the meaning: “An emphasis on function and somatic sensation at a certain point over time.”
Within the Segen’s Medical Dictionary (2012), the meaning is: “A normal term talking about the (good or poor) of the person, group or population inside a particular area, especially in comparison with other locations or with national data.”
The Medical Dictionary for that Health Professions and Nursing (2012) definition is: “The amount of health of a person, an organization, or perhaps a population as assessed with that individual or by objective measures.”
Based on the U.S. National Library of drugs, their definition is: “The amount of health of the baby, group, or population as subjectively assessed through the individual or by more objective measures.”
The American Thoracic Society definitions are: “Health status is definitely an individual’s relative degree of wellness and illness by considering the existence of biological or physiological disorder, signs and symptoms, and functional impairment. Health perceptions (or perceived health status) are subjective ratings through the affected person of their health status. Many people see themselves as healthy despite struggling with a number of chronic illnesses, while some see themselves as ill when no objective proof of disease are available.”
Grain College highlights that “there’s not one standard measurement of health status for people or population groups. Individual health status might be measured by an observer who performs a test and rates the person along any one of several dimensions, including presence or lack of existence-threatening illness, risks for premature dying, harshness of disease, and all around health. Individual health status can also be assessed by asking the individual to report his/her health perceptions within the domains of great interest, for example physical functioning, emotional well-being, discomfort or discomfort, and overall thought of health.”
Around the Biology Website, “the amount of health of the baby, group, or population as subjectively assessed through the individual or by more objective measures.” is the listed definition.
When analyzing and thinking about definitions, it’s important from the conceptual perspective to understand that definitions are just area of the perspective. For conceptual clearness, one must also consider context and relevancy to be essential as areas to pay attention to too.
How health status is decided is a vital perspective when used in a worksite wellness setting.